On this page we will discuss issues relating to the business side of sports. Currently, I am working on obtaining a business degree in Sports, Sponsorships, and Sales at Baylor University. Each week I will try to highlight a different story in the news about how business is influencing sports. The first is about the issue of a salary cap in Major League Baseball. I wrote this essay in college and believe there is definitely a valid argument on both sides of the issue.
Major League Baseball Salary Cap
The front office
of Major League Baseball and the fans are discussing whether or not, due to the
lack of a salary cap, the competitive balance could be skewed toward the teams
with a larger sum of money to spend on players. The lack of salary cap allows
for the New York Yankees to spend 208 million dollars on players, while the
Tampa Bay Rays only have the means to spend 29 million dollars. It is true that
in the year 2005, teams with a payroll under 50 million dollars won 10% fewer
games than teams with a payroll over 90 million dollars. However, studies have
shown incredible instability with this theory that the high market team has a
better opportunity to win (Abramowitz 1-2). In fact, I would suggest that a
salary cap in Major League Baseball is unnecessary for maintaining competitive
balance, and would also be detrimental to the goal of sustaining fan interest,
which the league has enjoyed for so many years.
Major League Baseball Compared
to Other Professional Sports
Currently, Major
League Baseball is the only one of the four major American sports leagues with
no salary cap. The National Basketball Association (NBA), National Hockey
League (NHL), and National Football League (NFL) all have a salary cap, which
sets an exact number on the amount of money a team is allowed to invest in
their players each year. If implementing a salary cap were vital to creating
competitive balance, then it would make sense for the other three leagues to
have a wider variety of champions. Since 1999, though, the numbers have not
agreed with that statement. There have been 16 different finalists in the Major
Leagues since 1999, compared to 16 in the NFL, 15 in the NHL, and only 11 in
the NBA. These numbers suggest that the MLB is equally, if not more so,
balanced than the sports leagues containing a salary cap (A Salary Cap in
Baseball? 1-2).
Homegrown Talent Wins
Over High Priced Free Agents
The advantage of
having more money as a professional team is that you have the ability to pay
for already established players in the free agent market. The alternative for
teams that cannot afford the higher priced players is to draft great young
talent, and then develop them through the minor leagues. Still on their rookie
contracts, these players are much cheaper, and actually tend to stay with the
team that drafted them for a discount price later on. It is very interesting to
look at the amount of impact that “homegrown” players have had on the recent
championship teams in Major League Baseball. The rosters of the St. Louis
Cardinals and San Francisco Giants, having combined to win the last three World
Series’, are filled with players that were drafted by these ball clubs so that
they would not have to compete for expensive free agents. Pablo Sandoval of the
Giants and David Freese of the Cardinals were each named MVP of their
respective World Series teams, each still being paid the same amount of money
as they were in the Minor Leagues. It is clear that winning does not depend
solely on the ability to spend an astronomical amount of money for the
well-known players.
Other Sources of Revenue
It is important to
note that revenue comes from many places other than the players on the field.
Surely fans attend games for the players themselves, but there are also many that
come for the ballpark attractions and game day promotions. Furthermore, each
team has the ability, often based on the success of the team, to sign
television and radio deals. By not having a salary cap, major league baseball
is allowing the teams to reinvest as much money as they can in the product on
the field. The success on the field then creates revenue in the other areas.
This competitive market, created by the freedom to spend money on players,
gives the teams an incentive to supply an exciting and diverse atmosphere for
all fans to enjoy (Haupert 1-2). The image below, taken at AT&T Park in San
Francisco, demonstrates the ability of a ballpark attraction to be another way
to gain revenue. The slide inside of a giant Coke bottle attracts young children
to the ballpark even if they are not interested in baseball. Additionally, the
Giants gain revenue off of the Coca-Cola sponsorship. If a salary cap were
implemented, the Giants would not be able to use that earned to better their
team. This would lower the incentive of creating such a wonderful spectacle.
Competitive
balance can be ensured in ways other than a salary cap. Daniel R. Marburger, in
his article “Gate Revenue Sharing and Luxury Taxes in Professional Sports,”
describes a well thought out plan, which would bring high-market team salaries
down without taking all the freedom out of the hands of the owners. Statistics
show that the talent of the home team is not the only factor in determining the
amount of tickets sold for a game. The visiting team has a large impact on the
game day attendance. The NBA found this out quickly when Michael Jordan entered
the league. Wherever Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls played, the arena was
completely sold out. The Bulls, therefore, decided that they deserved some of
the revenue from the opposing stadiums’ ticket sales. By allowing the visiting
team to share in the revenue of the ticket sales, Major League Baseball would
be lowering the value of a free agent. Teams would no longer see an advantage
to having the big star players, as they would have to share the revenue they
gain from him with other teams. This process would result in high-salary teams
lowering their payroll, bringing them closer to the rest of the pack (Marburger
3-5).
Oakland A’s Vs.
Kansas City Royals
Oakland A’s Vs. New York Yankees
The images above represent the difference in fan attendance
depending on the opponent. The Oakland A’s do not draw many fans against a
normal team, but when the New York Yankees come to town it is a completely
different story.
No comments:
Post a Comment